Ben Stein’s documentary Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed has ranked #12 in documentaries after 3 weeks. It could easily rank much higher after the DVD comes out. Has the scientific community shown any signs of remorse over their treatment of individuals and groups who question Darwinism, as illustrated in the film?ICR expelled: On April 24, a week after Expelled hit the theaters, the Texas State Board of Education denied the Institute for Creation Research (ICR) the right to grant graduate degrees in the State. ICR, a privately-funded organization, had been granting Master’s degrees in California for 27 years. It appears that Commissioner Raymund Paredes made his recommendation to deny the authorization after consulting with an undisclosed group of educators in non-public meetings. It also appears that ICR’s well-known creationist position, not the academic standards of its Graduate School, was the reason for the decision. ICR, which had been expecting easy approval based on a positive recommendation from the Site Evaluation Team in December (see ICR press release), considers this a clear case of viewpoint discrimination and an abridgement of their academic freedom. Their statement includes a 371-page document that had been delivered to the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. Even some of the most liberal supporters of intelligent design, who disapprove of young-earth creationism, have expressed alarm at the decision because of what it portends for any viewpoint deemed to lie outside the scientific consensus. Paredes may have been influenced by a negative editorial that appeared in Nature February 28. The editorial revealed that concerted arm-twisting was going on behind the scenes: “High-powered scientists in Texas are already weighing in, asking board commissioner Raymund Paredes to deny accreditation,” it said, “And there are signs that the board is listening.” The editorial called ICR’s creationist position “anti-scientific” even though its professors have PhDs from secular institutions. It even accused the graduate school of dishonesty: “ICR has managed to con its way into the California educational system for decades. Texas must not succumb as well.” ICR has always been above board in its dealings with the states of California and Texas. They never pressured anyone to succumb to anything. They met all requirements and answered all questions. This amounts to libel, but ICR was never given an opportunity to respond. Naturally, Nature was delighted in its April 30 issue with the denial decision. They proudly quoted a compliant commissioner, who had learned his talking points well. “Religious belief is not science,” Paredes said. “Science and religious belief are surely reconcilable, but they are not the same thing.”Context is key: Nature took the following swipe at Ben Stein in its featurette Sidelines: Scribbles on the Margins of Science from May 7:“Love of God and compassion and empathy leads you to a very glorious place, and science leads you to killing people.”Ben Stein, star of anti-evolution movie Expelled, adds his sensible and rational voice to the science-versus-religion debate, during an evangelical webcast.Stein’s comment was a summary statement at the end of a long discussion about Nazi science, not science in general. In the movie, Stein had made it clear he supported true science. His investigation was about the intolerance of Darwinists, whose leading spokespersons (Richard Dawkins, P. Z. Myers, William Provine, E. O. Wilson) are atheists, toward intelligent design. This out-of-context quote not only Nature’s complete denial of any culpability for fostering intolerance, but an attempt to tarnish the reputation of the whistleblower.Freedom is slavery: Scare tactics are often effective for avoiding rational discussion. A news story in Science took on the difficult task of explaining why it is important to oppose academic freedom legislation. Reporter Yudhijit Bhattacharjee set the tone of her investigation of Academic Freedom bills with a scary metaphor, “If creationism is a mutating virus, as many educators believe, then its latest guise is legislation to protect ’academic freedom.’” The scare quotes imply a conspiracy is lurking. Selling this line is a bit of an uphill battle, though. She quoted Barbara Forrest, activist against the bill in Florida, saying “It has been difficult to rally opposition.” Casey Luskin at Evolution News pointed out that Science quoted no proponents of the bill – only opponents. Bhattacharjee quoted evolution defender Eugenie Scott, for instance, claiming that Academic Freedom bills are essentially a “permission slip to teach creationism,” though there is nothing of the sort in the wording of the bills to suggest such a thing. Luskin used it as an illustration of “checkpoints” outlined in Expelled that guarantee the party line goes unchallenged. Incidentally, the Academic Freedom bill in Florida, which had looked set to pass earlier, got defeated by procedural derailments rather than debate, reported Robert Crowther for Evolution News.To revile or not to revile: Science on May 9 printed a pair of letters on the subject of whether to be considerate of creationists. (It should be noted that Darwinists lump creationism and intelligent design in the same category, despite volumes explaining the differences). They were responding to an earlier article that told, somewhat sympathetically, the story of one young scientist’s “traumatic” journey from evangelical belief in creationism to evolutionism. Craig Stevens (Oklahoma State) could not stomach the sympathy. “Science magazine is not the place to give even a hint of respectability to those who would deny the fundamental fact of evolution,” he said. “There is too much at stake, for our children and our society, to give any credence to those promoting unscientific nonsense (creationism or intelligent design) and justifying irrational beliefs under the guise of religion.” Andrew Whipple, biologist at Taylor University, had a more conciliatory tone. Based on his experience with students coming from a Biblical creationist background, he called for humility:We within the scientific community must continue to present the demonstrable evidence from the physical realm and clearly express how that evidence supports our current interpretations. This effort is not served well at all by dogmatic pronouncements such as “Evolution is fact,” even if such statements are accurate. Furthermore, for members of the scientific community to make theological statements in the name of science is philosophically illegitimate, and destructive in our truth-seeking efforts. In this short essay, Science has published the only example I have read in the leading scientific literature that takes the time and effort to understand and express what really drives the concerns of the majority of evangelicals, and does so in a manner that respects the integrity of both the scientific endeavor and the integrity of the faith commitments within the evangelical community. Allow me to suggest that this serves as a call to us in the sciences to be more humble as we interact with the faith community. We as scientists ought to be those most keenly aware of the tenuous and ever-changing nature of human knowledge, even as we build on that which has stood the test of time. We ought to behave as though the faith community poses no threat to the integrity of science, just as the faith community ought to behave as though science poses no threat to the integrity of faith…. Let us all humbly seek for truth as we respect one another’s efforts to do so.Even in this conciliatory letter, however, Whipple still implied that evolution is a fact because it has stood the test of time, which implies the dubious proposition that time is a measure of scientific validity (see best-in-field fallacy). He also drew an either-or distinction between the science community and the faith community. This fails to identify the faith involved in evolutionary theories. It also ignores the scientific evidence those with non-evolutionary theories employ in defense of their views. What may be most noteworthy, however, is his observation that the article was the “only example I have read in the leading scientific literature that takes the time and effort to understand” the concerns of the majority of evangelicals in a respectful tone.Beneath disdain: CMI published a response to a campaign by the Geological Society of London to fight creationism. (The quotes are from before the release of Expelled, but it is unlikely the film altered their attitude, based on condescending reviews in other pro-evolution journals.) In an editorial from the January issue of their magazine Geoscientist, Ted Nield not only conflated Intelligent Design with Young-Earth Creationism, he looked for space in the dungeon below contempt to find words to express the depth of his disdain. “Are Young Earth Creationists, Intelligent Designers and other adherents of long-exploded ideas even worth the expenditure of our contempt?” he asked.Some commentators have expressed alarm at the condescending tone that academics express to those outside their peer group. In a guest editorial for the UK Times Higher Education, Dennis Hayes exposed the disdain academics have for the general public. He found it ironic that academics are trying more to engage in public outreach while simultaneously treating the public as hapless, hopeless, ignorant and prejudiced. He pictured academics as out of touch – living in a closed society that generates misanthropic attitudes. Their own habits, though, provide a poor model for how one should behave like an intellectual: “At academic conferences, there is little discussion; there are hundreds of papers but few questions,” he accused. He warned that progress in understanding will only come when academics open themselves up to debate (cf. 04/09/2008). More focused on the issues brought up in Expelled was Ken Conner’s op-ed piece for Townhall.com. He alleged that modern academia is in a 1984 time warp, with its own thought police and revisionist policies. He alluded to the Orwellian turnabout wherein Academic Freedom bills are being opposed as “academic tyranny” by the very people who refuse to allow criticisms of their views. Conner juxtaposed the derisive comments of Darwinists against ID with some of their own irrational views expressed in Ben Stein’s documentary, such as life being seeded by space aliens or on crystals. “Intelligent Design,” he remarked, “seems eminently plausible compared to the ravings of these scientists who appear educated beyond their intelligence.” At issue, though, is the academy’s intolerance of contrary views. “These efforts to extinguish controversy and to mute dissenting voices are antithetical to traditional notions of academic freedom,” he ended. “But that doesn’t bother the scholars who are interviewed in the film. In the academy, it’s 1984 and, in their world, freedom is tyranny.”Poor, lovable old Ben Stein. Likeable, funny, common-sensical, soft-spoken, unflappable; a kinder, gentler celebrity one could hardly find, but now he has joined the Expelled. His reputation will be forever tarnished as one of “them.” All he wanted to do was open up the debate about Darwinism again. Such an innocent quest. In his droll, deadpan way, he interviewed the leading lights on both sides (and not a single young-earth creationist, by the way – those who have been so systematically marginalized that the mere mention of them brings a Pavlovian growl). Ben never raised his voice. His questions were the innocent, honest questions that a man on the street might ask. In a country that values academic freedom, what is it about this issue that gets scientists so upset?. In each interview, Stein sat there meekly without interrupting. He gave plenty of time for Dawkins, Myers and Ruse to explain what they meant. His producers sent them the types of questions that would be asked, paid them for their time, got their permission to use the footage, and followed standard documentary protocol. For this crime he has been viciously slandered by scientists and the secular media, who show absolutely no sense of remorse for their intolerance. They continue to illustrate the very point of Expelled: question Darwin and your career is over. If there is to be any revolution, any pressure to tear down the Berlin Wall that protects Darwinism from honest questions, it won’t be starting on the Darwin side. If anything, they are building it higher and thicker. Are you shocked by this? That academics, the ones historically the champions of academic freedom, have become some of its most vicious enemies? That the very ones who should be models of civility and rational discourse turn into sneering, snarling Dobermans at the mere sound of intelligent design? How could it be, when so many great scientists in history exalted the supreme architect of the universe in their work, and pointed to their admiration for God’s designs as motivation for doing science, that this could happen? It does happen, and it happens elsewhere, too: the very institutions set up to solve the problem wind up making it worse. Consider the following parallels. Recognizing that there are exceptions in each case, charges have been made repeatedly by numerous commentators that the following institutions do the opposite of what they were designed to do.Labor unions: Initially motivated to address real issues of worker rights and safety, unions and their bosses are almost synonymous with corruption. Workers refusing to join become targets of intimidation and physical violence. States have had to pass Right to Work laws (imagine that!) to protect workers from the very unions that were designed to help them. The unions, of course, spend their millions from the dues extracted by force from paychecks of common workers to lobby against such legislation, and routinely oppose any attempt to allow workers to designate whether they wish their dues to be spent on lobbying or not. To add insult to injury, labor unions pile on so much burden on corporations through exorbitant and unrealistic demands for pensions and benefits (enforced by threats of crippling strikes), they end up killing the goose that lays the golden egg – the employers who create jobs. The high cost of employment causes companies to go out of business or look overseas. Who loses? The laborer.The National Education Association has been called the most useless bureaucracy in Washington. One might think that it exists to help teachers and students. Instead, like the teachers’ unions, it defends and protects a top-sided bureaucracy bloated with administrators and office workers. Despite billions spent on education, student-teacher ratios continue to rise, test scores continue to plummet, American students continue to fall behind even many third-world countries, and some teachers have to spend their own money buying textbooks. Who loses? Public school students. Private schools and home schools, without NEA help or government funding, at a fraction of the cost, graduate students that score substantially higher on average.The National Endowment for the Arts exists, one would think, to uphold high standards of art appreciation and taste, to reward those with true talent, and to promote expressions of artistic excellence that bring national pride. How many new Mozarts or Raphaels can you name that thank this institution for their patronage? By contrast, how many news reports have you heard about “controversial” government-funded displays of a crucifix in urine, or a dung-splattered Madonna, or “artistic” exhibits of pig parts in formaldehyde?Racial organizations: Does any member of an ethnic minority really need an organization to speak for him? That’s an interesting question itself, because it would certainly backfire if some ethnic groups tried it. Regardless, certain black commentators (Bill Cosby, Thomas Sowell, Larry Elder, Juan Williams) have been pointing out for years that well-known black organizations and their high-profile leaders actually do more harm than good for black families. This is because creating an atmosphere of crisis is essential to their ongoing leadership. Actually solving problems would make them irrelevant. So while fatherless families, drug abuse and dropout rates never seem to improve, certain high-profile black leaders literally scream about racism in America with half truths, stoking the fires of racist conflict that keep them in the spotlight and create a cycle of self-fulfilling prophecy. Individuals who succeed and become integrated into the colorless society are accused of abandoning their roots; they are called awful names. The concentration on black identity works to perpetuate the very segregation that early civil rights leaders worked so hard to eliminate.The United Nations is perhaps the most egregious example of an institution becoming its own nemesis. What was the UN’s founding goal? World peace: to have nations work out their differences by diplomacy rather than war. There is arguably no war since its founding that the UN has successfully prevented, and oftentimes, it has made things worse. The same goes for its “humanitarian” causes. The world has known about the Sudan genocide for years; millions have died, and the UN has done worse than nothing: reports of UN workers raping the people they were sent to help have been scandalous. UN workers also stood idly by or fled during the Rwandan genocide. The UN was irrelevant in Cambodia, or in Iraq, or in any communist or radical-Islamic country you can name. The first relief workers on the ground after a disaster are usually privately funded Christian ministries like World Vision, Baptist World Alliance, Christian Freedom International and Gospel for Asia. The UN is so inefficient with relief, it sends supplies locals cannot use (condoms to families who are starving), or the food rots on the tarmac, or it is delivered into the hands of corrupt dictators instead of the suffering people. Imagine the craziness of sending relief to the Sudanese government, which uses it to buy weapons to attack Darfur! Millions of Africans die from malaria but the UN opposes spraying to kill the mosquitos that carry it. Millions die from AIDS but the UN opposes teaching people about the most effective prevention: abstinence. As for diplomacy, UN General Assembly meetings become soap boxes for the most radical countries to denounce the West. Since there are so many of small-country dictatorships, any voices of reason from democratic countries are often drowned out. The Security Council can never oppose totalitarian atrocities because one of the worst perpetrators, China, has veto power, as did communist Russia throughout the Cold War. The UN’s inability to act is legendary. Regardless of what you think about the Iraq war, President Bush’s coalition waited and waited for the UN to act on its own resolutions which mandated a military response to Saddam Hussein’s violations of UN rules. Coalition leaders pleaded with the UN to act on its own promises. The UN did nothing. Meanwhile, the magnitude of the scandals at the UN – oil-for-food being one of the worst in history – is breathtaking. Does anything change? Kofi Annan brought in Paul Volcker to investigate and propose reforms. Volcker found that oil-for-food was not unique, but endemic to the UN’s practices. He proposed sweeping reforms, including opportunities for outside audits. None of them were passed. After months of negotiations, the reforms were rejected by a margin of two to one! Endemic corruption has thus been validated as official UN policy. The world is now teetering under the threat of a nuclear Iran and North Korea, but the UN is essentially irrelevant, if not obstructionist in countering the threat. In sum, the greatest threat to world peace is now arguably the very institution chartered to safeguard it. For a depressing report on how bad things are in the UN, read an article by a man who knows, and who tried to fix it: former ambassador John Bolton. Writing for Imprimis April 2008, he said that any hopes that the UN could offer world peace have been completely dashed – and he gave plenty of stark examples.Yes, it is possible for institutions to become the worst enemies of the values they were created to protect. Don’t be surprised to see the defenders of Big Science behaving badly. When you see haughty, incorrigible, self-interested, dogmatic, irrational, corrupt, sneering hotheads claiming to speak for “science,” remember that other big institutions have called black white and white black. Other institutions have paid off the torturers with funds designated to help prisoners. Other institutions have poured gasoline on fires they were sent to quench, and killed the children they were sent to feed. Is there a common denominator to these reversals of values? As an exercise, check out how many are led by secular progressives embracing radical leftist ideology. At a more basic level, try human depravity. Give any depraved person or group power, and you know what power does. Each of the institutions listed above has some honest, hard-working individuals who don’t deserve the blame for what Headquarters is doing. Some of them decry the abuses but work within the institution either due to lack of alternatives or from sincere hopes to bring reform from within. A great many of the rank and file probably don’t even know what is going on. They assume an institution with a nice sounding name is doing its job, and they try to do theirs the best they know how. Maybe that’s the point. The best work is done by individuals. Science began with individuals. As an individual, you can make a difference. As an individual, you can change the world. (Visited 51 times, 1 visits today)FacebookTwitterPinterestSave分享0
16 April 2004The government says it is committed to developing the fledgling aerospace industry in South Africa – in the way that it has helped the country’s motor industry out of the starting blocks.South Africa’s strategy for aerospace industry growth – traditionally considered a difficult sector to enter – is to encourage international partnerships with overseas aircraft manufacturers in the component sub-system repair and maintenance area.R110m super-alloys plantThe industry was recently bolstered by the announcement of a R110-million Anglovaal Mining (Avmin) investment in a new plant to produce super-alloy metals for Rolls-Royce engines.The plant, at Pelindaba outside Pretoria, is expected to produce 4 000 tons of the super-strong steel within three years, mostly for export, with potential earnings of R750-million a year for South African Airways (SAA), Business Day reports.The project forms part of offset deals linked to arms and aircraft purchases by the government and SAA.Two Malaysian contracts for GrintekDefence technology group Grintek also announced recently that it had secured two contracts with the Malaysian government.ThisDay reports that Avitronics, a joint venture between Grintek and Saab of Sweden, has been awarded the first phase of a contract to supply Malaysia with 18 multi-sensor warning systems for its new Sukhoi fighter aircraft.The first and second phases of the order are valued at over US$20-million, or R134-million, with the first phase starting immediately.According to ThisDay, Grintek subsidiary Grintek Aviation Systems will also be supplying and installing instrument landing equipment to a civilian airport in Malaysia.The two deals follow numerous negotiations between the two countries, helped by President Thabo Mbeki’s visit to Malaysia last year.New aircraft purchases ‘have already paid for themselves’ThisDay also reported recently that South Africa’s multi-billion-dollar purchases of jet fighters and trainer aircraft from BAE Systems have already paid for themselves through offset investments in the manufacturing sector and export sales.BAE says it expects to achieve a R14.8-billion milestone in investments, exports and sales in 2004. “We have undertaken to deliver a significant economic benefit to the country”, BAE executive director Bernard Collier told ThisDay. “What we’ve done now is, instead of words, we’ve proven it with action.”The aerospace industry has proved a difficult nut to crack for newcomers – even when they’ve had the financial clout.Avmin’s Rick Menell says it has been looking for projects for the past six years to add value to minerals before they are exported. He told Business Day that the value of the nickel-based alloys could be multiplied by a factor of seven following the new investment.Menell added, however, that the market is “closed”, with accreditation very hard to achieve without a partner.Regional maintenance hubSouth Africa is increasingly becoming important as a regional hub for maintenance repair organisations serving operators flying in sub-Saharan Africa.During 2000-2005, capital expenditure by the Airports Company South Africa (ACSA), a state-owned corporation and the largest airport operator in South Africa, is projected to be US$234-million.Several commercially run regional airports, some of which have international status, are sources for airport projects. Many local airport developers are also looking to fund the upgrading of existing smaller airports, and to turn them into more competitive international facilities.SouthAfrica.info reporter
Now that SciELO-SA is a full member of the global SciELO network, usage and citations of local published work is expected to rise. (Image: SciELO-SA) Journals are considered for inclusion in SciELO once they receive a favourable evaluation from ASSAf’s journal quality peer-review panel.(Image: Pretoria University) MEDIA CONTACTS • SciELO-SA Academy of Science of South Africa +27 12 349 6600 RELATED ARTICLES • Research output rises, papers double • Boost for knowledge economy • Tusker research goes social • Global award for SA business school • SA academic gets top science award Janine ErasmusSouth Africa’s minister of science and technology Derek Hanekom has launched the South African version of the Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO-SA). It’s a searchable full-text journal database that is completely open-access – that is, free to access and free to publish.SciELO is a boon for the local and international research community, and is expected to strengthen the scholarly journal evaluation, editing, publishing and accreditation systems in the country, according to the project’s website.The database comprises 26 peer-reviewed journals at the moment, but is expected to eventually feature at least 180 of South Africa’s 300 journals. It is part of the Brazilian SciELO project, which is driven by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (The Foundation for Research Support of the State of São Paulo, in partnership with the Latin American and Caribbean Centre on Health Sciences Information.The project is funded by the Department of Science and Technology, maintained by the Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf), and endorsed by the Department of Higher Education and Training.South Africa joined SciELO in 2009, becoming part of a group that includes Argentina, Venezuela, Portugal, Mexico, Spain, Cuba, Costa Rica, Colombia and Chile. The project is in development in Uruguay, Paraguay, Bolivia and Peru. Over 1 000 journals – that’s more than 433 000 articles – are available at the main SciELO portal.Each centre follows the same methodology and uses the same technology, which was developed by SciELO Brazil, the origin of the project. All sites, South Africa included, have a Portuguese, Spanish and English interface.In April 2013 SciELO-SA received certification as a fully operational collection indexed in the global SciELO portal.Over the past four years SciELO-SA had achieved the “mandatory quality criteria” needed to become a full member, said Susan Veldsman, director of ASSAf’s scholarly publishing unit.It complies with criteria such as publishing standards, periodicity, data curation and management, bandwidth and intellectual property rights, among others.Making research data more widely availableJournals are considered for inclusion in SciELO, according to the website, once they receive a favourable evaluation from ASSAf’s journal quality peer-review panel. For more information or to submit a journal for consideration, contact email@example.com Some of the publications freely accessible on SciELO-SA include Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (25 issues); the Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research (five issues); the South African Journal of Industrial Psychology (eight issues); the South African Journal of Science (36 issues); and Water SA (24 issues).The South African Journal of Science was the first journal to make its appearance on SciELO-SA, back in 2009. However, said Veldsman, other journals from around Africa could also be hosted on the platform, provided that they too receive a favourable evaluation from the panel.“This [platform] will result in much wider stakeholder usage and collaboration among the South African, regional and global scientific communities,” she said.Searching and sharingJournals may be searched or browsed via an alphabetic list of titles, a subject list or a search form by entering the title of the serial, publisher name, city of publication and/or subject.The interface also provides access to the full text of articles via author index or subject index, or by a search form for various elements such as author names, subject, words from the title, words from the full text, and publication year.Abstracts and full article text may be printed or shared. The sites provide usage statistics based on the number of article downloads, and impact indicators based on citations – this allows tracking of not only individual journals’ performance, but each collection as a whole. The information gathered from tracking will in turn improve the process of evaluating scholarly articles.SciELO provides dissemination tools such as the ability to send the article via email, or post a link to social media.
Related Posts Top Reasons to Go With Managed WordPress Hosting A Web Developer’s New Best Friend is the AI Wai… Tags:#How To#start#startups Because today’s startup generally requires significantly less seed capital to function, the legal contracts once required for large-scale deals are no longer appropriate. Rather than forcing startups to draft lengthy legal documents, one attorney is offering an invaluable resource to entrepreneurs. Best known as the Fenwick and West attorney responsible for Twitter, Ted Wang recently released a series of templates to help startup companies navigate the difficult task of investment financing. The Series Seed documents are a set of guideline documents that allow startups raising less than $1.5 million dollars to lighten the burden of the legal process. Documents include a certificate of incorporation, a preferred stock purchase agreement, an investors’ rights agreement and a seed term sheet. Says Wang, “From an investor’s perspective, while moving away from the traditional full-blown financing documents entails giving up a number of rights and protections, when taken across numerous transactions, the benefits of spending less time and money on the documents outweigh the cost of sacrificing these additional rights and protections. Moreover, I don’t believe there’s anything included (or excluded) in these documents that will be wildly controversial.” Should there be any controversy, Wang plans on open sourcing the documents for discussion in the near future. While entrepreneurs may use the documents at their own risk, some of the endorsers of the resource include Charles River Ventures, Ron Conway with SV Angel, First Round Capital and Polaris Ventures. To download all four documents entrepreneurs can visit seriesseed.com. For additional resources on how to actually get to this portion of the investment process, early-stage companies should consult Venture Hacks’ series entitled Term Sheet Hacks. Why Tech Companies Need Simpler Terms of Servic… 8 Best WordPress Hosting Solutions on the Market dana oshiro
Transfers Arsenal January transfer news LIVE: Injury could stop Evans move Last updated 1 year ago 22:00 1/28/18 FacebookTwitterRedditcopy Comments(0) Transfers Arsenal Premier League Goal brings you all the latest news, rumours and deals related to the Gunners as the January transfer window heats up Pardew: Injury could stop Evans moveWest Brom boss Alan Pardew has suggested a hamstring injury suffered by Jonny Evans in Saturday’s FA Cup win over Liverpool could scupper a January move for the Northern Ireland defender.Pardew revealed on Friday that the club have received approaches for the 30-year-old but that none had met the Baggies’ valuation of the player, who has 18 months left on his contract.Read his full comments on Goal. Editors’ Picks Lyon treble & England heartbreak: The full story behind Lucy Bronze’s dramatic 2019 Liverpool v Man City is now the league’s biggest rivalry and the bitterness is growing Megan Rapinoe: Born & brilliant in the U.S.A. A Liverpool legend in the making: Behind Virgil van Dijk’s remarkable rise to world’s best player Pellegri explains Monaco moveItalian wonderkid Pietro Pellegri has explained that Monaco’s famous talent for youth development persuaded him to choose the club over a host of top European sides.Monaco completed the signing of 16-year-old Pellegri from Genoa for a reported fee of €25 million on Saturday.The forward, who was linked with Serie A champions Juventus as well as Arsenal, Chelsea and Manchester United, has agreed a long-term deal at Stade Louis II.Read the full story on Goal right here! Arsenal & Chelsea scout Rochdale teenagerArsenal and Chelsea have both made enquiries about signing Rochdale’s teenage midfielder Daniel Adshead, reports ESPN .The 16-year-old has made seven appearances for Dale this season after making his first-team debut for the League One club back in September.He has been scouted regularly by Arsenal and Chelsea, who are now preparing to step up their interest as Rochdale manager Keith Hill attempts to hold on to Adshead.Gibbs-White agrees Wolves dealWolves teenager Morgan Gibbs-White has agreed a professional contract with the Championship leaders, reports The Sun .Arsenal, Liverpool and Tottenham all showed interest in Gibbs-White, who impressed for England at the Under 17 World Cup last year.However, the midfielder has decided to commit his future to Wolves and stay at Molineux, rather than push for a move to the Premier League.Juve move for Arsenal target CarrascoJuventus have opened talks for Arsenal target Ferreira Carrasco according to Sky Sports Italia (via CalcioMercato ). The Belgian has a €100 million release clause in his contract with Atletico Madrid, and the Serie A side are desperate to replace the recently injured Juan Cuadrado. Burnley eye Holding loanBurnley are keen on signing Arsenal defender Rob Holding on a loan deal until the end of the season, according to The Sun on Sunday .Clarets boss Sean Dyche wants to add more competition for first-choice centre-backs Ben Mee and James Tarkowski, and sees Holding as the ideal alternative.The Gunners will only consider letting Holding leave, though, if they can secure a move for West Brom’s Jonny Evans.Arsenal told to pay up for AubameyangBorussia Dortmund have told Arsenal to pay up for Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang this month, according to the Daily Star .The Gunners are interested in signing the Gabon international but have thus far refused to meet Dortmund’s £55m valuation.A £45m bid was rejected by the German club, who are determined to play hardball as they attempt to retain their key man.Mourinho: Alexis was cheap!Jose Mourinho has insisted that Alexis Sanchez was a “cheap” signing for Manchester United, despite his astronomical wages.”He was cheap, wasn’t he?” said Mourinho. “A free transfer! He was free. For that price, he is fantastic. I think everyone thinks the same in this country.”You can read his full comments here. Dortmund issue Aubameyang warningDortmund have told Arsenal that they will not easily be parted with Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang.Speaking to Sky Sports, Dortmund sporting director Michael Zorc said: “We have our position, just as last summer when Barcelona tried to sign him. We are willing to work on a transfer if certain criteria are met.”Arsenal have tried several times but we have refused everything up until now. Either our demands will be fulfilled and there will be a transfer, or they won’t be and Auba plays for Dortmund until the summer.Read the full story on Goal Arsenal agree terms with Benzema Real Madrid striker Karim Benzema has agreed personal terms with Arsenal for a summer move, reports Diario Gol . The France striker’s transfer to London is still up in the air, however, with Madrid demanding €60m for the 30-year-old and Arsenal only prepared to pay €40m.
Australia draws first blood in the Trans-Tasman Mixed Open series. In cool conditions at Trusts Arena in Auckland it was the Australian Mixed Open team that signalled the Australianâ€™s intent for this yearâ€™s Trans Tasman Series following their emphatic World Cup victory in 2015.New Zealand though to their credit were very strong and brave in defeat: victory clutched away from them in the dying seconds of the match.The match was significant for Elin Mortimer the day after celebrating her birthday notching a hat-trick along with Leah Opie-Lukins enjoying a memorable Trans-Tasman return with three touchdowns to her name as well. â€œIt was a real arm wrestle to be honest,â€ Australiaâ€™s Assistant Coach, Justin Creighton said post-match. â€œWe came out expecting it be a grind and it was even more-so than we thought. A couple of big moments we needed to win and we didnâ€™t â€“ and that put us under pressure.â€œWe were very happy in the box and felt that if we go through it with our composure and if we keep calm and stick to our processes we would get there in the end.â€œNZ played a very clever and smart style of game and exploited a few areas we didnâ€™t even know we had so we will work on these. Katherine Stevens in defence and James Blackwood were really strong too as well, but all the guys did great and particularly those on debut tonight.â€ Dean Springfield opened Australiaâ€™s account very early in the opening stanza and set the tone for the Australians scoring within the first minute following a nice sweep play.Elin Mortimer on the left flank danced with the sideline and was the next to score but a quick reply by Danyon Morgan-Puterangi within the next set brought New Zealand right back into the match.Opie-Lukins crossed-out wide at the seventh minute for Australia with Morgan-Puterangi going over for his double early in the match. Mortimer crossed for an early brace at the 15th minute mark, the recipient of another good long ball out wide.The Kiwisâ€™ Mark Hodson scored following great lead-up work again by their number six, Mackenzie Haugh bringing the score to 4-3 and then Sammi Stanton on the cusp of half-time brought the score level to go into the break with the scores all locked-up.Te Tuhi Muir-Tuuta opened the scoring for New Zealand in the first half and Leah Opie-Lukins crossed again out wide on the stroke of half-time taking both teams to the sheds with five in the bank.Within thirty seconds though the Kiwis moved in front for the second time in the match only to see Trent Touma squeezing his first try in near the right corner post to lock the score up again 6-all.New Zealand captain Wiremu Takerei crossed then Katherine Stevens from Australia following some great phase play by Springfield and Lang. Zara Nicholas followed up soon-after with a great touchdown as well.Then a late sweep to the right corner brought Dylan Thompson delivered Opie-Lukins her hat trick.New Zealand wasnâ€™t going away though with Rauwhero scoring wide-out from a brilliant 25m left to right pass just one in arrears. Te Tuhi Muir-Tuuta scored his double with a minute left to lock-up with scores again.Elin Mortimer scored her hat-trick within the last 30 seconds avoiding the dreaded drop-off and putting the exclamation mark on a very exciting match.Australia can now breathe a sigh of relief and look to wrap up their series in Game Two tomorrow.FINAL SCORE: Australia 10 (Mortimer 3, Opie-Lukins 3, Springfield, Touma, Nicholas, Stevens) defeated New Zealand 9) Muir-Tuuta 2, Morgan-Puterangi 2, Takerei, Stanton, Hodson, Robinson-Bartlett, Rauwhero)Related LinksMixed match report
chris daniels father upset with texasOn January 4, 2006, in one of college football’s most prestigious venues, Vince Young and the Texas Longhorns made sports history. UT’s national championship upset of Pete Carroll’s dynastic USC Trojans has been selected as the No. 34 best moment in sports history by Sports Illustrated. SI, on the epic win for the Longhorns:DATE / Jan 4, 2006 LOCATION / Rose Bowl | Pasadena, Calif.MOMENT / The 2006 BCS Championship featured a pair of unbeaten powerhouses, but in the end, it was Texas and QB Vince Young who stood tallest. Young, who accounted for a record 467 yards of offense, rushed in the game-winning score with 19 seconds remaining to lift the Longhorns over the USC Trojans 41-38. IMPACT / Players from this instant classic dominated the NFL draft, with four of them going in the top 10 (Young went No. 3). An NCAA investigation would eventually conclude USC’s Reggie Bush received illegal benefits while at the school, causing the Trojan to vacate their 12 wins from that season.Texas is one of eight college football moments included in SI’s Top 100 list. Only “The Play” from the 1982 Cal-Stanford game edges it out from the sport. We can’t argue with that. Vince Young’s performance was unforgettable.For the full list, click here.[Sports Illustrated]More: The 10 CFB Teams That Could Go Undefeated In 2016 >>>
APTN National NewsQuestions are beginning to mount over an audit of Peguis First Nation emergency spending, released by the Canadian Taxpayers Federation.The audit looks at how money for flood relief was spent between 2009 and 2011. It contains details of payments in excess of $200,000 made directly to chief and council, and large discrepancies on the number of houses that were sandbagged.Peguis chief Glenn Hudson responded by referring to the document as a draft audit, and labelled it as another attempt by critics to undermine his leadership.The CTF says that band members came forward with the document. Aboriginal Affairs has yet to comment.APTN National News reporter Tiar Wilson has the details.
Video streaming service Netflix has extended the functionality of its Xbox service in the US and is launching it in Latin America.It has been optimised for Xbox and now allows users to select more TV series and movies on screen, new interactive options and support for titles in high-definition.The Xbox service has also launched in Latin America in Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Mexico. Under the terms of a wider agreement with Microsoft, Netflix said that it now has the rights to launch its service on Xbox in new international territories as it rolls out.
Friends, the hit sitcom that first ran on television between 1994-2004, has been voted as the most popular programme for five to 16-year-olds in the UK, according to a Childwise report.The majority of 2,000 youngsters surveyed by Childwise voted the show as a favourite. The iconic 90s sitcom was picked in large part due to “the focus on friendships and relationships” which is relatable to teens, according the research group.Almost 40% of the age group are using the internet when they are outside, as well as when they are at home, according to the report. Childwise says this connectivity is making them feel alone and isolated as a result, making the show which focuses on friendships appealing.The researcher also thinks the shows resurgence is due to its presence on Netflix.“They can watch it virtually whenever and wherever they like, from beginning to end in order and with ease, in a way that they couldn’t before it was on Netflix (when it was previously only on Comedy Central) unless they broke out their parents’ old DVD boxsets,” said Childwise research director Simon Leggett.About seven in 10 of this age group had used Netflix in the week that they week questioned.YouTube was the most used platform among the age group, followed Snapchat, said the research firm.The broad appeal of Friends, and the fact that it can draw in audiences that may have not even been born while it was on terrestrial television, is one reason why Netflix shelled out US$100 million to keep the title on its platform at the end of 2018.